Reaction test: Windows 10 Preview vs Mono vs NetMf, Arduino - Raspberry Pi Forums
hi!
wanted know how fast raspberry pi 2 windows 10 insider preview , universal app react on signal on input port. built test scenario arduino stopwatch , device has react fast possible falling edge input port (generated manual push button) low signal output port. falling edge receive arduino stopwatch , stop measurement.
measured other configurations, too.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a012f/a012f755e4fa4d65cc617aa18263607c29a67ace" alt="image"
values in micro seconds.
"ausreißer" column means there measurements high. maybe because operating system has done task @ same time.
in "schleife" columns there results endless loop code whereas in "interrupt" columns results interrupt or event based code are.
of course, arduino fastest - least powerfull processor.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e4a/f4e4ad5596a59ded064f11e1cfd31b46889279a7" alt="smile :)"
think it's because there no operation system , no other things slow done execution.
know how long reaction time different technologies. slowest reaction time of 0,026 seconds may fast enough applications - not everything.
keep in mind tested insider preview of windows 10. results not show performance of final windows 10 version!
made more detailed posting on page:
http://netmf-tutorial.de/reaktionszeit- ... n-arduino/
hope helps someone.
bye,
daniel
update 2015-08-15: today measured pi final version of windows 10. 8 times faster ctp-version if poll ports directly.
updated image, too.
wanted know how fast raspberry pi 2 windows 10 insider preview , universal app react on signal on input port. built test scenario arduino stopwatch , device has react fast possible falling edge input port (generated manual push button) low signal output port. falling edge receive arduino stopwatch , stop measurement.
measured other configurations, too.
values in micro seconds.
"ausreißer" column means there measurements high. maybe because operating system has done task @ same time.
in "schleife" columns there results endless loop code whereas in "interrupt" columns results interrupt or event based code are.
of course, arduino fastest - least powerfull processor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4e4a/f4e4ad5596a59ded064f11e1cfd31b46889279a7" alt="smile :)"
think it's because there no operation system , no other things slow done execution.
know how long reaction time different technologies. slowest reaction time of 0,026 seconds may fast enough applications - not everything.
keep in mind tested insider preview of windows 10. results not show performance of final windows 10 version!
made more detailed posting on page:
http://netmf-tutorial.de/reaktionszeit- ... n-arduino/
hope helps someone.
bye,
daniel
update 2015-08-15: today measured pi final version of windows 10. 8 times faster ctp-version if poll ports directly.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f17d4/f17d44e9259cb98dda05cc84375d7e9ce1f0f035" alt="very happy :d"
you not comparing like. using different languages on place.
common language on these platforms c see results c on of them.
should able reduce maximum response times setting higher priority on process.
common language on these platforms c see results c on of them.
should able reduce maximum response times setting higher priority on process.
raspberrypi
Comments
Post a Comment